Early Career Workshop - January 2021-Presentation Recording

Video Transcription

Video Summary

The video provides tips for increasing the chances of getting a negative study published. It suggests framing the study well by explaining the rationale and significance of the research question, being transparent about the methods used, conducting a thorough literature review to show the study's contribution to existing knowledge, discussing the implications of the results on clinical practice or future research, clearly stating the limitations of the study, and considering alternative outlets if facing difficulties in publishing in top-tier journals. The video emphasizes that negative or null results can still contribute to the scientific knowledge base and help prevent publication bias towards positive results.<br /><br />In addition, the video summarizes a workshop on academic career development. The workshop covers various topics, such as the importance of publishing in academic careers, time management, mentorship, networking, and the role of statistics in research. The speakers, who are fellows of the International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Editorial Fellowship, share their experiences in scientific communication and publishing. The workshop includes a question and answer session to address specific inquiries from attendees. Overall, the workshop offers valuable insights and guidance for individuals interested in pursuing an academic career or improving their research and publishing skills. The audience is encouraged to continue learning and exploring opportunities in academic medicine and research.

Keywords

negative study publication

study framing

research question rationale

transparent methods

literature review

study contribution to knowledge

results implications

study limitations

alternative outlets for publishing

negative results contribution

academic career development

publishing importance

time management

mentorship

networking